Climate Risk for Zip Code 52338

Financial Exposure & Physical Hazard Analysis

Risk Summary

The primary drivers of climate-related financial risk in zip code 52338 are Tornado, Inland Flooding, and Strong Wind. This area also faces an unusually high intensity for Cold Wave, Hail, Drought, Wildfire, and Landslide compared to national averages.

Data SourceFEMA National Risk Index (December 2025 Update)

Understanding the Dollars

Expected Annual Loss (EAL) is a statistical average of property damage for this entire zip code over a standard year across all properties.

  • / It represents the "average cost" rather than a guaranteed yearly bill.
  • / It can be used to compare the relative risk from different hazards and across different neighborhoods.

Primary Risks

Tornado

$853,702

Expected Annual Loss for Zip Code 52338

98.2Score

Very High compared to US average

Inland Flooding

$630,944

Expected Annual Loss for Zip Code 52338

44.9Score

Relatively Low compared to US average

Strong Wind

$267,255

Expected Annual Loss for Zip Code 52338

97.9Score

Very High compared to US average

Zip Code Risk Map

Legend
Very Low
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
Extreme

Financial Risk Inventory

MAJOR DRIVER
Tornado
$853,702
Score: 98.2
MAJOR DRIVER
Inland Flooding
$630,944
Score: 44.9
MAJOR DRIVER
Strong Wind
$267,255
Score: 97.9
UNUSUALLY HIGH
Cold Wave
$229,228
Score: 82.2
UNUSUALLY HIGH
Hail
$108,546
Score: 89.9
Heat Wave
$75,007
Score: 66.5
UNUSUALLY HIGH
Drought
$61,490
Score: 93.8
UNUSUALLY HIGH
Wildfire
$20,332
Score: 87.0
Lightning
$17,928
Score: 58.5
Winter Weather
$10,766
Score: 79.8
Ice Storm
$10,051
Score: 65.3
Earthquake
$4,228
Score: 14.4
UNUSUALLY HIGH
Landslide
$3,986
Score: 95.7
Hurricane
$166
Score: 21.6

Recommended Mitigation Strategies

Recommended investments to protect your property value and reduce insurance liability based on your local risk profile.

🌪️High Investment

Tornado Mitigation

Reinforce garage doors and consider a FEMA-approved safe room or storm cellar.

Risk Score: 98.2
💧Medium Investment

Inland Flooding Mitigation

Install a smart sump pump with battery backup and extend downspouts 10ft from foundation.

Risk Score: 44.9
💨Low Investment

Strong Wind Mitigation

Trim large trees back from the roofline and reinforce roof-to-wall connectors (hurricane straps).

Risk Score: 97.9
🏠Low Investment

Cold Wave Mitigation

General property maintenance and insurance review recommended.

Risk Score: 82.2
🧊Medium Investment

Hail Mitigation

Replace roof with Class 4 impact-resistant shingles to significantly lower insurance premiums.

Risk Score: 89.9
🏠Low Investment

Drought Mitigation

General property maintenance and insurance review recommended.

Risk Score: 93.8
🔥Low Investment

Wildfire Mitigation

Create a 5ft 'non-combustible' zone around your home using gravel or pavers instead of mulch.

Risk Score: 87.0
⛰️High Investment

Landslide Mitigation

Professional slope stabilization and foundation drainage inspection is highly recommended.

Risk Score: 95.7

Methodology and Sources

Spatial Aggregation

Our "Atlas" risk scores are derived using a population-weighted spatial join. Because US Zip Codes and Census Tracts do not share perfectly aligned boundaries, a simple geographic average would be misleading. We utilize US Census Block Group population statistics to identify where residents actually live within a Zip Code. We then intersect these points with FEMA National Risk Index (NRI) hazard data to calculate a weighted exposure score.

Financial Projections (EAL)

Expected Annual Loss (EAL) estimates the average economic impact of natural hazards in dollars per year. This calculation incorporates three components: Exposure (the value of structures and agriculture), Annualized Frequency (historical probability), and Historic Loss Ratio (vulnerability of the area).

Primary Data Sources

  • FEMA National Risk IndexHazard frequency and loss data (v1.20.0)
  • U.S. Census BureauTIGER/Line 2025 Shapefiles & Decennial Population

Nearby Locations

52338 Climate Risk Report | Financial & Hazard Analysis