Climate Risk Atlas/WA/Skamokawa Valley

Skamokawa Valley, WA Tsunami & Climate Risk Profile

The primary drivers of climate-related financial risk in Skamokawa Valley, WA are Tsunami, Inland Flooding, and Earthquake. This area also faces an unusually high intensity for Coastal Flooding, Heat Wave, Landslide, and Volcanic Activity compared to national averages. Based on recent federal data, homeowners in this market face an estimated average annual insurance premium of $1,589.

City Risk Scorecard
Physical Resilience46/100

Based on FEMA EAL and hazard intensity.

Insurance Stability
Market Stable

Metrics indicate a balanced risk-to-premium environment with standard renewal rates.

Spatial Analysis

Flood Plain Analysis

Significant Flood Exposure in Skamokawa Valley

FEMA Flood Maps for Skamokawa Valley identify the "100-year" and "500-year" floodplains (1% and 0.2% annual chance), but modern climate risk analysis suggests that nearly 25% of flood insurance claims originate from properties outside of these designated high-risk zones.

Use the map above to better understand risk by looking at both the FEMA flood plain maps and FEMA Risk Inventory maps by census tract. Standard FEMA maps may not account for 'flash flooding' from intense rain events.
FEMA Designation vs. Reality
Very High
Relative Vulnerability
$215,894
Annualized Property Exposure

Insurance Market & Climate Stress Analysis

Current Avg. Premium (2022)

$1,589
Latest Market Rate

Recent Year Change

+-13.9%
YoY Increase

2030 Forecast

$1,714
Based on 0.95% CAGR

Market Retreat (Non-Renewals)

0.00%

Higher rates indicate insurers are actively reducing exposure to Skamokawa Valley due to climate-linked risk.

Underwriting Stress (Loss Ratio)

13.0%

A ratio over 70% suggests insurers are paying out nearly all premiums as claims, forcing future price hikes.

Historical Market Trends

Toggle series below to compare costs vs. market stress indicators

Historical Trends & Forecasting

Compare premium costs against underlying risk factors.

Primary Risks

Tsunami

$241,902

Expected Annual Loss for Skamokawa Valley

95.9Score

Relatively High compared to US average

Inland Flooding

$215,894

Expected Annual Loss for Skamokawa Valley

95.9Score

Very High compared to US average

Earthquake

$117,231

Expected Annual Loss for Skamokawa Valley

92.3Score

Relatively High compared to US average

Financial Risk Inventory

MAJOR DRIVER
Tsunami
$241,902
Score: 95.9
MAJOR DRIVER
Inland Flooding
$215,894
Score: 95.9
MAJOR DRIVER
Earthquake
$117,231
Score: 92.3
UNUSUALLY HIGH
Coastal Flooding
$111,741
Score: 99.6
UNUSUALLY HIGH
Heat Wave
$23,250
Score: 93.2
Cold Wave
$3,444
Score: 41.7
Strong Wind
$1,916
Score: 55.0
UNUSUALLY HIGH
Landslide
$1,683
Score: 98.5
Tornado
$1,275
Score: 26.5
Ice Storm
$1,138
Score: 73.6
Wildfire
$412
Score: 78.4
Lightning
$294
Score: 18.8
Winter Weather
$168
Score: 41.8
Hail
$136
Score: 25.9
UNUSUALLY HIGH
Volcanic Activity
$10
Score: 91.8
Avalanche
$1
Score: 2.8

Recommended Mitigation Strategies

Recommended investments to protect your property value and reduce insurance liability based on your local risk profile.

🏠Low Investment

Tsunami Mitigation

General property maintenance and insurance review recommended.

Risk Score: 95.9
💧Medium Investment

Inland Flooding Mitigation

Install a smart sump pump with battery backup and extend downspouts 10ft from foundation.

Risk Score: 95.9
🏠Low Investment

Earthquake Mitigation

General property maintenance and insurance review recommended.

Risk Score: 92.3
🏠Low Investment

Coastal Flooding Mitigation

General property maintenance and insurance review recommended.

Risk Score: 99.6
☀️Low Investment

Heat Wave Mitigation

Ensure attic insulation is R-49+ and consider a dual-fuel backup generator for AC.

Risk Score: 93.2
💨Low Investment

Strong Wind Mitigation

Trim large trees back from the roofline and reinforce roof-to-wall connectors (hurricane straps).

Risk Score: 55.0
⛰️High Investment

Landslide Mitigation

Professional slope stabilization and foundation drainage inspection is highly recommended.

Risk Score: 98.5
❄️Medium Investment

Ice Storm Mitigation

Install a 10kWh backup battery system to keep pipes from freezing during grid failure.

Risk Score: 73.6
🔥Low Investment

Wildfire Mitigation

Create a 5ft 'non-combustible' zone around your home using gravel or pavers instead of mulch.

Risk Score: 78.4
🏠Low Investment

Volcanic Activity Mitigation

General property maintenance and insurance review recommended.

Risk Score: 91.8

Sources and Methodology

Spatial Climate Risk Modeling

The Expected Annual Loss (EAL) and hazard risk scores are derived from the FEMA NRI zip code dataset using a population-weighted spatial join. Because Zip Codes and Census Tracts do not share perfectly aligned boundaries, we utilize US Census Block Group population centroids to identify where residents actually live.

Financial & Insurance Metrics

The pysical resilence score is calculated by synthesizing Expected Annual Loss (EAL) against the total building replacement value within a jurisdiction. This creates a "Loss Ratio" that measures physical resilience. We supplement this with ZIP-code level data from the U.S. Treasury's Federal Insurance Office (FIO), monitoring trends in premium growth, loss ratios, and policy non-renewals to identify emerging "Insurance Deserts."

Primary Data Sources

Nearby Cities

Zip Codes in Skamokawa Valley